By Irina Nikolaeva
This booklet explores the character of finiteness, one among most typically used notions in descriptive and theoretical linguistics yet probably one of many least understood. students representing numerous theoretical positions search to elucidate what it truly is and to set up its usefulness and barriers. In doing in order that they show cross-linguistically legitimate correlations among topic licensing, topic contract, stressful, syntactic opacity, and autonomous clausehood; express how those homes are linked to finiteness; and speak about what this suggests for the content material of the class. the problems explored contain how diversified grammatical theories signify finiteness; no matter if the finite/nonfinite contrast is common; no matter if there are levels of finiteness; no matter if the syntactic suggestion of finiteness has a semantic corollary; even if and the way finiteness is topic to alter; and the way finiteness beneficial properties in language acquisition. Irina Nikolaeva opens the publication by means of describing the historical past of finiteness and its position in present pondering and examine. She then introduces the chapters of the e-book, evaluating the authors' views and displaying what they've got in universal. The publication is then divided into 4 components. half I considers the function finiteness performs in formal syntactic theories and half II its deployment in useful theories and because the topic of analysis in typology. elements III and IV glance respectively on the finite/nonfinite competition in person languages and on the position finiteness performs in linguistic switch and linguistic improvement. The e-book is written and dependent to entice students and scholars of syntax and basic linguistics at graduate point and above.
Read or Download Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations PDF
Best foreign language study & reference books
This booklet explores the character of finiteness, one among most typically used notions in descriptive and theoretical linguistics yet very likely one of many least understood. students representing numerous theoretical positions search to elucidate what it's and to set up its usefulness and obstacles. In doing so that they display cross-linguistically legitimate correlations among topic licensing, topic contract, stressful, syntactic opacity, and autonomous clausehood; express how those homes are linked to finiteness; and speak about what this implies for the content material of the class.
Das Temperament pr#228;gt den Charakter. Nie kam dies deutlicher zum Ausdruck als in den verschiedensten Einsatzm#246;glichkeiten des Fliegers im Zweiten Weltkrieg. »Die Bomber hatten eine vom Jagdflieger verschiedene Einstellung«, schreibt Werner Baumbach #252;ber den Typ des Kampffliegers. »Die paintings ihres Einsatzes #252;ber weite Strecken, in das Hinterland des Feindes, #252;ber See, bei Schlechtwetter und bei Nacht, der geschlossene Angriff im Verbandsflug, #252;berhaupt die Eigenschaften des langsameren Bomberfluges, all das bestimmt das Gesicht des Kampffliegers, der #228;u#223;erlich ruhiger, ausdauernder, gesetzter (in der Jagdfliegersprache: »sturer«) erschien.
- Le parole italiane
- Germania (Lateinisch - Deutsch)
- Die griechische Plastik (Handbuch der Archaologie)
- Variety in Contemporary English
- Elektromagnetische Energiewandler: Elektrische Maschinen, Transformatoren, Antriebe
Additional resources for Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations
Adger (1996) argues that these structures involve movement from a postVN position into the speciWer of an Agr head, which is realized by the particle a in (54b). The arguments for this analysis come from the behaviour of pronominal objects with emphatic particles in these constructions. Emphatic particles usually attach directly to a pronoun, as in (55): (55) Bhuail mi iad-fhe`in. ’ If we examine the behaviour of pronominal objects in VN constructions, we see that the particle which precedes the VN inXects for person, number, and gender features.
Without the presence of agreement, and where it plays a role in Turkish, that role is secondary. As in Adger’s chapter, syntactic Wniteness corresponds to a distinct position in the clausal architecture which can be sensitive to diVerent morphological features across languages, either tense or agreement. Unlike tense, however, agreement does not have a semantic interpretation and cannot represent a clause’s temporal independence. If semantic Wniteness relates to temporal independence, as has been argued in various places, this suggests that semantic and syntactic Wniteness, while coinciding in many instances, do not always go hand in hand.
I provide new data from Scottish Gaelic where clauses are truncated at the VP layer, and the licensing of the subject has to be VP-internal, with concomitant eVects on the temporal interpretation of the construction. As discussed in the introduction to this volume, and in KornWlt (chapter 9 below), generative grammar took traditional ideas of morphosyntactic Wniteness and reiWed them as structures where Wniteness is a property of an independently projecting functional category and is only secondarily realized on the verb itself.